
Towards Service Excellence
HKCSI Position Paper on Promoting Services
December 1995
Summary of Recommendations
The global context
- Government should take an active part in the ongoing negotiations on GATS commitments,
taking full account of the views of the private sector in the negotiations. To achieve
that, government should strengthen its advisory mechanism on global and regional trade
policy. In the area of trade in services, the HKCSI sector committees are probably the
most elaborate, albeit informal, mechanism yet available for consultation by government.
- Government and the private sector should work together to assess the GATS schedules of
commitments and to translate them into commercially relevant language in order that the
value of the GATS could be promoted to the private sector. At the same time, training
programmes for officials involved in the implementation of GATS and its application to
trade promotion should be considered.
- Besides liberalisation of trade (in both goods and services), government should take
active part in multilateral liberalisation of investment. It should monitor closely the
progress of investment liberalisation in APEC and OECD, as well as press for
liberalisation of investment to be put firmly on the WTO agenda.
- Hong Kong should take the leadership in hosting regional events such as WTO, APEC, PECC,
PBEC and other international forums.
- Government should coordinate with the private sector to take an active part in global
and regional events taking place outside of Hong Kong, such as APEC and PECC events and in
particular, the WTO ministerial meeting in Singapore in December 1996. There should be
closer cooperation between Hong Kong government's Geneva office where WTO is located, its
Singapore office where APEC is headquartered, and private sector policy bodies such as the
HKCSI.
- To facilitate cooperation and understanding between the private and public sectors,
government should regularly take part in international private sector meetings, such as
CSI conferences, in an observer capacity.
Enhancing domestic capacity
- Government should review existing regulatory framework for service industries
with a view to simplifying regulations where there is evidence of over-regulation.
Government should also support self-regulation by industry by endorsing such efforts and
promoting in the international arena the high ethical standard and good practice of Hong
Kong services.
- Government should take part in campaigns to enhance quality for service industries. It
should take the lead by encouraging ISO 9000 certification as well as endorsing good
practices such as TQM and TQS.
- Government together with the private sector should assist small and medium enterprises
in the service sector to enhance quality and improve productivity. They should explore
market solutions, such as the application of franchising and the use of support schemes to
small businesses, to address the needs of SMEs as well as create incentive for the
workforce to commit to the service industries.
- Government should consider providing support facilities for research and development for
service industries, using the support schemes administered by Industry Department for
manufacturing as a reference.
- Similarly, government should consider jointly with the private sector the need for
skills development of the service industries.
- The current re-training scheme should be upgraded. There should be an emphasis on
motivating the unemployed, enhancing understanding of the service industries, and creating
a positive attitude towards service sector careers. This attitude training is crucial to
meet the needs of the service industries.
- In the longer term, "attitude education" should become a feature of the
education system. Hong Kong needs to develop a service culture if it is to continue
succeed as a service economy.
- Government should support the creation of an award in services. This could be done
through introducing an additional Trade in Services Award to the Hong Kong Industry Award,
or as a separate award scheme run by the HKCSI with specific categories such as trade
services, hospitality, finance, business services, transportation, etc., provided that the
funding could be made available.
- Government should encourage tripartite effort among business, government and academics
in considering the promotion of services. Other than actively participating, it should
consider sponsoring the first such major event.
- There should be a tripartite effort to improve statistics in services. Government should
be prepared to devote more resources to developing statistical data in services.
External promotion
- The promotion of services exports should not be limited to the
"tradeable services" as defined by KPMG, but should also be related to those
service transactions delivered through "commercial presence" and
"consumption abroad".
- Export promotional policies should be led by the private sector. In designing these
programmes, the identifying of sectoral linkages and appropriate promotional themes is as
important as, if not more important than, identifying sectors for promotion.
Organisational option
- A restructuring of current organisational resources in promotion may be
required. Before the organisation structure is finalised, the relationship between
external promotion and other promotional activities should be thought through. Whatever
the form of the final structure, promotion should be private-sector led, with current
resources (both public and private sector) deployed in the most efficient manner. To
achieve this, some form of review or audit of current resources through a combined
private/public sector effort will be required. The HKCSI would be happy to participate in
this process of reviewing organisational resources and we look forward to an early
opportunity of making further recommendations on organisational options in the course of
the Task Force's deliberations.
Sectoral recommendations
- Tourism: The development of the travel/tourism industries should be
supported by full manpower planning and long-term education. There should also be better
coordination with the other service industries in the promotion of tourism, as well as a
focus on the relationship between tourism services and other infrastructure and support
facilities.
- Cruise liner industry: More terminals should be built for cruise liners within
the harbour. In the longer term, there may be merits for a separate port authority to be
established to regulate commercial port facilities such as those required for the cruise
liner industry.
- Financial services: The financial services industries should, together with the
regulator, take advantage of the 1997 IMF/World Bank Convention in Hong Kong to not only
generate international publicity, but also formulate a strategy to maintain and reinforce
Hong Kong's lead in the region, using the City of London business plan as a reference.
- Computer services: Government should explore ways of assisting Hong Kong computer
services industry expand through using China as a "back-office" in software
development.
- EDI: EDI should be promoted not only to trade but also to other business
operations.
- Information technology: An information infrastructure strategy for Hong Kong
would be urgently needed if Hong Kong were to become a communications hub for the
information industries.
- Transport: Hong Kong should move into a "total transport service" of
which maritime transport is but a part. Multimodal services would become the leading edge
and Hong Kong's land-based transport services should be ready to catch up.
- Culture: There should be a comprehensive policy of integrating the development of
the arts, culture and entertainment together with tourism, taking advantage of Hong Kong's
East-meets-West character.
- Professional services: China offers a large market for professional services and
in order to tap into this market, multi-disciplinary practices should be promoted whereby
various professions combine to offer their expertise in areas demanded by China's
developmental needs, e.g. construction, infrastructure, environment. At the same time, a
partnership could be created between Hong Kong and Mainland professionals in the
scientific disciplines combining the skills of Chinese professionals with the management
and business orientation of their Hong Kong counterparts.
- Management consultancy: Government could help facilitate the development of the
management consultancy sector through:
- hiring more local consultants;
- publicising some of their works;
- setting forth a set of transparent criteria for selection of management consultants, one
of these criteria should be the consultant's subscribing to a code of ethics such as that
of the HKCSI;
- in external promotion, government should include this sector in the overall promotional
campaign for service industries, both on its own and in relation to other sectors such as
financial services and information technology.
Towards Service Excellence
HKCSI Position Paper on Promoting Services
December 1995
Introduction
- It has been a long-held position of the HKCSI that more attention should be given to
promoting Hong Kong's service industries and improving their regional competitiveness. To
that end, the HKCSI conducted a survey of service industries practitioners in March 1994
to identify and establish the need for promotion of services. It took an active part in a
steering committee established by the former Financial Secretary Sir Hamish Macleod, and
in the subsequent consultancy study by KPMG Peat Marwick on promotion of services exports.
- Whilst accepting the main finding of the KPMG report, the HKCSI is of the view that
development of the service sector is a much wider issue that merely promotion of exports.
With the creation of the government task force on promotion of services by Financial
Secretary Mr Donald Tsang, we believe the way forward is to move beyond the conclusion of
the KPMG report and to examine the promotion of services within the wider context of Hong
Kong's economic development and the challenges and opportunities for the Hong Kong economy
as a whole.
The framework
- Hong Kong's economic prosperity has often been attributed to a number of
"success factors". These include an open and free market economy with minimal
government supervision, a world class, state-of-the-art infrastructure including
telecommunications and transport; a simple, business-friendly tax system; and a wide range
of financial and professional services of the highest standards. While they have
contributed to Hong Kong's economic growth, these "success factors" are not
unique to Hong Kong. Our competitors can and some indeed are moving along the same path.
More and more countries are speeding up their liberalisation and deregulation programmes,
upgrading their infrastructure, offering tax incentives, and giving priority to the
financial and professional services industries. There is no room for complacency and Hong
Kong should strive to maintain its leading edge in the region.
- In seeking to enhance its competitiveness and capacity for growth, Hong Kong should be
alert to challenges arising from both the wider, global economic context and Hong Kong's
own domestic business environment, before it could effectively promote its services
externally. There are, in our view, three aspects in the consideration of the development
of service industries, namely:
- The international, global context. Although Hong Kong itself has entered a
"post-manufacturing" era, much of Hong Kong services still have their basis in
manufacturing, most Hong Kong-related manufacturing activities being now in South China or
other neighbouring economies rather than Hong Kong. In other words, Hong Kong is a
successful service economy because it has been able to service not only itself but the
economic growth of China, Taiwan and the Asia-Pacific. It follows that the future of Hong
Kong's service sector depends on external demand of Hong Kong services as much as, if not
more than, demand from within the domestic economy. The more growth there is in the global
economy and international trade, the more favourable the environment will be for Hong
Kong's service sector. While there may be little Hong Kong can do to influence the global
economy, Hong Kong does not have to, and should not, be passive. It should be actively
involved in global economic policy making, such as in the multilateral forums on trade
liberalisation. Hong Kong's active participation in creating an environment for global
free trade and investment will be conducive, albeit indirectly, to the development of its
service industries.
- The domestic context. Among the business sector there is a perception that the
biggest threat to Hong Kong industries is rising business costs, notably high rents and
staff costs. In addition, there is a concern that there are increasingly more demands on
the business sector to pay for social welfare. Together they are eroding the margin and
eating away at Hong Kong's competitiveness. Being less capital intensive, service
industries are particularly vulnerable. To remain competitive, Hong Kong needs to upgrade
its capacity for growth through raising standards, improving productivity, and creating a
business-friendly regulatory environment. With an enhanced domestic capacity, business and
employment will follow naturally.
- External Promotion. The global market for services is not a perfect market. Even
if Hong Kong have good services to sell, businesses do not appear automatically. Before a
service is successfully sold, barriers over access to distribution channels have to be
overcome. Some of these barriers may be of a regulatory nature which cannot be resolved
other than through negotiation. More often, the barrier lies in not enough knowledge and
understanding of Hong Kong by its potential trading partners. Of all the strengths of Hong
Kong, public relation about Hong Kong itself does not seem to be one. Negative images of
Hong Kong over 1997 has not helped either. There is an urgent need therefore to project a
correct image of Hong Kong overseas as well as promote business opportunities for Hong
Kong businesses abroad.
The role of government
- "Promotion of services" conjures the image of government selecting
industries for favourable treatment. Government should not be surprised if it finds some
individual sectors or industries are tempted into demanding preferential treatment. This
should be resisted. Hong Kong's success has always been based on an open market with a
level playing field and minimal government intervention. This should be maintained.
- This does not mean that government should stay out of the picture altogether in the
development of the service industries. Often a service transaction is much more than a
simple sale and purchase, but has wider economic, social and even moral implications. In
some cases a government role in regulating services is justified on the grounds of
consumer protection or prudential supervision, although the temptation to over-regulate or
over-legislate must be firmly resisted. In other cases, market imperfection may stifle
competition and efficiency. Government may have a role in thus facilitating business by
removing obstacles to market efficiency as well as assisting industry to overcome
constraints which prevent them from fully participating in the market.
- In our view, it is much more important for government to take a broader view in
facilitating the private sector's capacity to overcome barriers and constraints and to
foster a competitive market environment, than to identify specific industries for
government action. Although government assistance to specific sectors is not unjustified,
government should follow, rather than lead, industry in the development of high-value
sectors for Hong Kong. For example, government should not and could not decide to make
Hong Kong a financial centre, but government could provide the regulatory environment and
support instruments to enable the financial services industries to continue to flourish.
While it is useful, in considering how to promote the service industries, to understand
the needs of the concrete service sectors, we would sound a word of caution against an
overzealous effort to identify sectors for promotion.
- The highly interrelated character of service industries makes it difficult to focus
attention on any single sector on its own. Services producers and investors rarely
consider their own service in isolation from others. From the point of view of promotion,
there seems to be a greater need for more understanding of the interrelationship of
service industries than to contemplate efforts in individual industries. To use tourism as
an example, it is a highly promotable sector because it is not an industry but a mode of
delivery of a range of related service industries which make them highly successful in
creating value for Hong Kong. A important objective of promotion of services should
therefore be to identify core themes for promotion which would make positive use of Hong
Kong economic advantages, rather than individual service sectors.
- This is not to detract from the usefulness of identifying problems and opportunities for
specific sectors, which will yield insights for the overall promotional strategy. We shall
also be contributing our own views on selected sectors although it should be emphasised
that this sectoral understanding is of necessity an ongoing exercise.
The global context: Multilateral liberalisation
The impact of the Uruguay Round
- The most significant development in multilateral liberalisation is that of
the Uruguay Round. As an export-oriented economy, Hong Kong is poised to take advantage of
increased trade from the Uruguay Round brought about, for example, by lowering of tariffs
in importing countries. However, the benefits to domestic manufacturing industries may not
be that apparent. Instead, because MFA quotas are to be phased out, local textile
manufacturers may be induced to relocate to other areas of lower production cost, hence
reducing domestic exports as well as employment. The effect may be quite substantial
considering that over 60% of Hong Kong's textile and clothing exports are MFA-related.
- On re-exports, increase in global demand is to create more opportunities for Hong Kong,
especially as China is expected to benefit substantially from both tariff reduction and
quota removal. The net result, according to a GATT report, is that full implementation of
the Uruguay Round will increase Hong Kong's exports by a net of HK$85 billion, or 8% of
total trade, at 1993 prices. An extra HK$14 billion, or 1.6%, will be added annually to
Hong Kong's GDP. There will also be a net gain of 32,000 new jobs. It should be borne in
mind, however, that these net gains will not materialise automatically. Some of the
re-exports will have to be achieved at the expense of a reduction in domestic
manufacturing and exports. Furthermore, the post-Uruguay Round trading environment will be
much more competitive. Although Hong Kong has never shied away from competition - rather,
Hong Kong has always thrived on competition - other economies will be equally keen to
compete for these opportunities.
- Hong Kong thus needs to constantly upgrade its domestic capacity in trade-related
services, as well as participate in multilateral forums to ensure that the momentum of
global trade liberalisation is maintained. In particular, Hong Kong should continue to
take an active part in liberalisation of trade in services, since much of the re-export
activities are service-oriented.
Multilateral liberalisation
- Hong Kong government should continue to facilitate liberalisation of global
trade through ongoing participation in the WTO, especially in the negotiations over
commitments in market access and national treatment for services. Much of the value of the
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) lies in the schedules of commitments, most
of which have already been agreed in the Uruguay Round while some are still being
negotiated. Much of the meaning of these commitments are, however, lost in the arcane
wording of the WTO languages, and their commercial relevance is little understood. On the
other hand, officials who are familiar with the wordings of GATS may not be close enough
to the everyday business situation to be able to appreciate completely the commercial
implications of the commitments. There is a need, therefore, for the private and the
private sectors to work together to decipher and publicise the commercial value of the
GATS schedules. Here industry guidelines on the impact of the GATS produced by the US
Commerce Department will provide a useful reference. At the same time, other officials
involved in trade promotion such as the government overseas officers need also to
familiarise themselves with the results of GATS and their implications. In Canada, for
example, a series of training programmes on assisting service exporters abroad are being
conducted for their overseas diplomatic missions. These training programmes are targetted
not towards trade negotiators, who are familiar with the GATS, but for officials who are
involved in the implementation of GATS and its application to trade promotion. Similar
training programmes for Hong Kong's officials involved in export promotion should also be
considered.
- Besides, the subject matter of global liberalisation has now moved beyond trade into
other areas such as investment. The GATS provides a good example, in that under GATS,
services exports could be delivered through "commercial presence", which is
closely intertwined with foreign investment. A number of approaches are now being made by
APEC and the OECD in investment liberalisation, such as the recent APEC Action Agenda in
respect of investment liberalisation, and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI)
being developed by the OECD. Hong Kong should closely monitor developments in APEC and
OECD. More importantly, it will be in the interest of Hong Kong to ensure that a
multilateral investment regime is established within the WTO, the only genuinely
multilateral institution. Hong Kong should take advantage of the first post-Uruguay Round
ministerial meeting of the WTO, to be held in late 1996 in Singapore, to put investment
firmly on the WTO agenda. Hong Kong should also display more leadership by taking up
opportunities to host APEC and WTO events.
Private sector
- It is the responsibility of the government to take part in multilateral
policy negotiations on behalf of Hong Kong. Yet government officials do not trade or
invest; private businesses do. The private sector should have an essential role in
providing government with input in these multilateral negotiations. Its participation
should not be limited to merely giving of advice. Often active involvement by the private
sector will not only make it easier for front line officials, but will positively benefit
the private sector itself, as the case of the US private sector has shown.
- The Hong Kong private sector has traditionally been less forthcoming in contributing to
international policy making than its European or North American counterparts. While within
the private sector, businessmen need to be made more conscious of the importance of
contributing to global trade policy, government could help by strengthening the network of
consultation on regional economic policy making, as well as sponsoring private sector
participation in non-business, policy-oriented events, such as the WTO ministerial meeting
at Singapore. Having been an active participant in WTO-related activities (together with
the other CSIs) as well as APEC, PECC, PBEC and UNCTAD events, the HKCSI will be happy to
follow up with government on developing a format to strengthen private sector
participation in these multilateral events.
- Within the private sector, the HKCSI will continue to play a leading role within the
region in coordinating business participation in the global CSI movement. It has been
tasked with assisting the establishment of similar bodies in Asia, and to that end some
progress has already been made with related agencies in China and Malaysia, which both
participated in the last CSI Conference in Dublin at the invitation of the HKCSI. At the
same time, the Australian CSI is beginning to focus itself on developing leadership within
Asia, and is currently exploring the possibility of organising a workshop on service
sector regulatory regimes in the Asia-Pacific and their business implications.
- Collectively, the CSIs have agreed to be linked together electronically through the
Internet, and to that end a feasibility study is now being conducted. They have agreed,
among other things, to hold periodic meetings in the form of a directors' meeting
alternating with a Conference. The former will typically be held in Geneva with a focus on
influencing the WTO Council on Services, while the latter will be more practically
business-oriented. Present projects include preparation of a paper for the WTO to advocate
development in services data, and another calling for more user-friendly and commercially
relevant presentation of the GATS schedules.
Recommendations
- The HKCSI's recommendations in respect of government's role in the global
context include the following:
- Government should take an active part in the ongoing negotiations on GATS commitments,
taking full account of the views of the private sector in the negotiations. To achieve
that, government should strengthen its advisory mechanism on global and regional trade
policy. In the area of trade in services, the HKCSI sector committees are probably the
most elaborate, albeit informal, mechanism yet available for consultation by government.
- Government and the private sector should work together to assess the GATS schedules of
commitments and to translate them into commercially relevant language in order that the
value of the GATS could be promoted to the private sector. At the same time, training
programmes for officials involved in the implementation of GATS and its application to
trade promotion should be considered.
- Besides liberalisation of trade (in both goods and services), government should take an
active part in multilateral liberalisation of investment. It should monitor closely the
progress of investment liberalisation in APEC and OECD, as well as press for
liberalisation of investment to be put firmly on the WTO agenda.
- Hong Kong should take the leadership in hosting regional events such as WTO, APEC, PECC,
PBEC and other international forums.
- Government should coordinate with the private sector to take an active part in global
and regional events taking place outside of Hong Kong, such as APEC and PECC events and in
particular, the WTO ministerial meeting in Singapore in December 1996. There should be
closer cooperation between Hong Kong government's Geneva office where WTO is located, its
Singapore office where APEC is headquartered, and private sector policy bodies such as the
HKCSI.
- To facilitate cooperation and understanding between the private and public sectors,
government should regularly take part in international private sector meetings, such as
CSI conferences, in an observer capacity.
The domestic context: capacity building
Economic re-structuring and the value challenge
- Hong Kong's economic restructuring in relation to China's dramatic economic
development is well-known. This restructuring has often been described as one of
transformation of manufacturing to services. We prefer, however, to see the restructuring
as one from low-value to high-value processes. At present, Hong Kong can justifiably claim
that its products and services are not only high-value but good-value - otherwise Hong
Kong would not be the successful economy that it is. The challenge is that in an
increasingly competitive world, Hong Kong's products and services have to be even
better-value. This has to be achieved against the backdrop of increasing cost of business
for the service sector, as reflected in high rents and wages. Because of higher costs and
prices, clients and consumers are becoming more selective and demanding on value. Often,
the value of services are evaluated not on prices, but on the basis of their standard and
quality. The value challenge for Hong Kong services is therefore a challenge of standard
and quality.
Quality and Self-regulation
- While Hong Kong's reputation as a world-class service centre is well
deserved, among individual service industries the growing number of practitioners has led
to a large variation in the level and quality of services being offered. Such variation
has in turn led to a disparaging of the industries and of their practitioners. There is
thus a need to identify means of encouraging companies and individual practitioners to
aspire to and achieve excellence, thus raising standard and the image of the service
industries. The challenge will be even greater as Hong Kong is increasingly becoming the
service centre to Mainland China, where standards are still being developed and quality is
sometimes not the prime concern. In that context it is even more important to ensure that
only truly professional and high-quality services are provided in China and that firms
entering the market bring with them standards of the highest quality.
- There is a need, therefore, for some form of regulation of service industries to ensure
consumer protection, enhance competition and promote good practice. We believe that the
most effective way of ensuring that standards and quality remain high is through
self-regulation by the private sector, rather than government regulation. Again,
cooperation between private and public sector is needed if regulation is to achieve its
aim of fostering rather than stifling good business practice. Service industries should
regulate their own affairs taking account of ethical, legal and moral standards.
Government should resist the temptation to over-regulate, and positively assist industries
to establish and promote self-regulation and good business practice.
Productivity and quality
- Quality should be a concern not only at an industry level but, perhaps more
importantly, at a corporate and practitioner's level. Firms of different sizes and nature
may have different requirements, but they should all be alert to the quality challenge.
Despite very good performances, however, many Hong Kong companies still lack a
"quality sense". The TQM (total quality management) and TQS (total quality
service) movements are still unfamiliar to many corporations. ISO 9000 certification is
just beginning to gain recognition in Hong Kong, and of those so far awarded, only a
handful are service companies.
- Some of the bigger corporations in the service sector (such as Hong Kong Telecom and the
Standard Chartered Bank) have taken the lead to adopt a total quality approach by seeking
and obtaining ISO 9000 certification. The bulk of Hong Kong's small and medium enterprises
(SMEs), however, are less receptive to TQS and ISO 9000. This is a situation which we
should seek to change. SMEs should be persuaded of the need for good management and
business practices. TQM and ISO certification should not be applicable only to large
firms. At the same time, more innovative solutions to improving management and business
practices among SMEs should be developed. One example of a solution is that of
franchising, which provides better management and incentive to improve overall
productivity, typically of retail-based services but also of other business services.
- The drive for good quality and practice must come from the private sector, but again the
government can and should play a useful facilitating role. It could help, for example, in
launching macro-level campaigns aimed at quality enhancement and encouraging good
practice. In addition, it could consider designing appropriate schemes to assist the
development of service industries, using as reference its current programmes to assist the
manufacturing sector. A number of agencies now exist to facilitate the manufacturing
industries, for example, the Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC) and The Hong Kong
Industrial Technology Centre (HKITC). Industry Department administers the Applied Research
and Development Fund and the Additional Funding for Industrial Support Scheme to encourage
research and development, as well as the New Technology Training Scheme to support skills
development. Admittedly, the requirements of the service industries are different and a
fresh approach may be required in considering institutional arrangements in providing
support facilities. However, the core concerns will remain basically the same, namely,
quality, productivity, technology, research and development, and skills development.
Employment implications
- Throughout the economic restructuring of the last decade, Hong Kong has by
and large been able to create enough jobs in the service sector to absorb jobs lost from
manufacturing. In recent years, however, there is increasingly pressure of a mismatch of
skills between new jobs and unemployed workers from manufacturing. This pressure will be
even bigger for the next ten years as the phasing out of the Multifibre Arrangement is
expected to lead to another significant loss in jobs for the manufacturing workforce. The
challenge thus remains to provide suitable retraining for the displaced workers to enable
them to continue to contribute productively to our economy.
- The mismatch of skills has created a situation where despite the existence of an
unemployed workforce, many of the service industries are still experiencing a labour
shortage. We believe these industries would be prepared and would indeed prefer to hire
the unemployed workers who have been appropriately re-trained. However, their experience
is often that despite efforts by industry and the Employee Retraining Board, the shortage
is still not adequately met, including by those who have been retrained. Sometimes this
may be due to the difficulty of acquiring the service skills as, for example, many of the
jobs in the hospitality sector requires foreign language proficiency which manufacturing
workers lack. However, more often the problem lies not in technical skills, but in the
lack of a "service orientation" - a set of attitudes and a frame of mind which
motivate workers to provide quality service to clients.
- We understand that for many people a change mid-way through their careers from
manufacturing to services would be difficult, especially after going through the trauma of
being made unemployed at no fault of their own. But this highlights precisely the
importance of retraining attitudes, rather than just skills. Those with the right attitude
will acquire the skills sooner or later. Those without the attitude towards a service
sector career will not enjoy doing their job, and will not do the job properly, even if
they have been trained in the skills. Whilst supporting the need to step up the retraining
programme, we wish to highlight the need for more emphasis on motivating the unemployed,
enhancing understanding of the service industries, and creating a positive attitude
towards service sector careers.
- However effective the retraining schemes may be, they remain an "administrative
solution", rather than a "market solution" to restructure the labour force
in line with the needs of the economy. We believe market solutions which drive and
motivate people to enter new industries are always more effective than administrative
solutions whereby workers are being directed, somewhat involuntarily, to change career. An
example of a market solution is franchising which has been alluded earlier - a franchisee
will be much more motivated than an employee. For the same reason, support schemes to
small businesses may create some further opportunities. Again, the design of market
solutions cannot be done by any one sector in isolation, but requires cooperation amongst
government, industry and labour.
- In the longer term, "attitude education" should become a feature of the
education system. Hong Kong needs to develop a service culture if it is to continue
succeed as a service economy.
Encouraging best performance: Hong Kong Industry Award
- One of the market-oriented measures of promoting quality is through rewarding
good performance. In this connection we wish to highlight a recent recommendation of the
HKCSI to create an award in the Hong Kong Award for Industry for the service sector. We
have offered to become the leading organiser for a Trade in Services Award, based on
performance in export of services.
- There may be a concern that the addition of another category to the Hong Kong Industry
Award may dilute the funding for existing category of awards. We would point out that as
far as we are aware, two-thirds of the $3.5 million sponsorship in 1994 came from service
industries. In two of the six existing categories of the Hong Kong Industry Award, only
less than 10 contenders had entered in 1994. The HKCSI is confident that the addition of
the services category will attract more participation from quality entrants in the service
sector, and thus add considerable value to the Award scheme. Alternatively, there may be
merit in considering a restructuring of the entire Award itself, or the creation of a
separate award scheme for services with specific categories such as trade services,
hospitality, finance, business services, transportation, etc. If the funding for such a
new scheme of awards could be made available from government - private sector sponsorship
having already been secured for the existing Hong Kong Industry Award - there is no reason
why the award scheme for services could not be organised in 1996. Indeed, we are confident
that such a scheme could be run in a most cost-effective manner by the HKCSI.
Tripartite partnership
- A tripartite effort among business, government and academics can be very
useful in galvanising efforts to promote the service industries. The thinking of officials
tend to be compartmentalised, of businessmen over-pragmatic, and of academics too
detached. On the other hand, the down-to-earth approach of business, the political and
diplomatic wisdom of officials, and the intellectual input of academics could very well
reinforce each other. The US tripartite partnership has shown that despite different
angles and sometimes different languages, academics, businesses and government officials
can engage in a productive dialogue, such as displaying a uniformity of views and a
complementarity of positions on matters of US interests (for example, in seeking market
access to other countries). cooperation.
- Promotion of services is an issue where a tripartite partnership should be utilised to
good effect. A useful starting point is to organise such a tripartite symposium on the
service sector, to address issues ranging from international trade and investment policy,
domestic opportunities and challenges, and the socio-economic impacts of Hong Kong's
structural transformation. The HKCSI will be happy to be the lead organiser of such an
event. For this purpose, a small budget of some $0.3 million should suffice to produce a
good-quality two-day event with participation from internationally renowned figures in the
services field, with whom the HKCSI is familiar. The HKCSI would need to seek sponsors
although a short-cut may be for government to provide the funding on the justification
that this is a form of support for industrial development.
Statistics
- It is the consensus of the international CSIs that statistics on trade in
services, and of services in general, are badly in need of upgrading. It is undesirable
and sometimes even dangerous for business and political decisions to be made on the basis
of poor or inadequate statistics. In the US, 75% of statistical resources are being
devoted to 25% of the economy - namely, manufacturing - which is losing jobs. Hong Kong
may not be far different. Again, a tripartite effort is required if statistical
improvement is genuinely to be achieved. On the part of government, it should be prepared
to devote more resources to developing statistical data in services, such as a more
elaborate statistical system on trade in services, consumer and producer price indices on
services, value-added and productivity measures in services, and industrial or sectoral
studies of service industries. Separately, the CSIs are collectively calling for the
creation of a statistics commission under the WTO Council of Services. Hong Kong
government should support this initiative.
Recommendations
- The HKCSI's recommendations in respect of government's role in enhancing the
domestic capacity include the following:
- Government should review existing regulatory framework for service industries with a
view to simplifying regulations where there is evidence of over-regulation. Government
should also support self-regulation by industry by endorsing such efforts and promoting in
the international arena the high ethical standard and good practice of Hong Kong services.
- Government should take part in campaigns to enhance quality for service industries. It
should take the lead by encouraging ISO 9000 certification as well as endorsing good
practices such as TQM and TQS.
- Government together with the private sector should assist small and medium enterprises
in the service sector to enhance quality and improve productivity. They should explore
market solutions, such as the application of franchising and the use of support schemes to
small businesses, to address the needs of SMEs as well as create incentive for the
workforce to commit to the service industries.
- Government should consider providing support facilities for research and development for
service industries, using the support schemes administered by Industry Department for
manufacturing as a reference.
- Similarly, government should consider jointly with the private sector the need for
skills development of the service industries.
- The current re-training scheme should be upgraded. There should be an emphasis on
motivating the unemployed, enhancing understanding of the service industries, and creating
a positive attitude towards service sector careers. This attitude training is crucial to
meet the needs of the service industries.
- In the longer term, "attitude education" should become a feature of the
education system. Hong Kong needs to develop a service culture if it is to continue
succeed as a service economy.
- Government should support the creation of an award in services. This could be done
through introducing an additional Trade in Services Award to the Hong Kong Industry Award,
or as a separate award scheme run by the HKCSI with specific categories such as trade
services, hospitality, finance, business services, transportation, etc., provided that the
funding could be made available.
- Government should encourage tripartite effort among business, government and academics
in considering the promotion of services. Other than actively participating, it should
consider sponsoring the first such major event.
- There should be a tripartite effort to improve statistics in services. Government should
be prepared to devote more resources to developing statistical data in services.
External promotion
- The promotion of services exports has already been extensively covered in the
consultancy report by KPMG to which the HKCSI has responded in detail, so our remarks need
only be brief. In our response we have pointed out that promotion of services should not
be limited to the "tradeable services" as defined by the consultant. Instead
those service transactions delivered through "commercial presence" and
"consumption abroad" should merit equal attention. In designing promotional
programmes, the identifying of sectoral linkages and appropriate promotional themes is as
important as, if not more important than, identifying sectors for promotion. We emphasised
that services promotional campaigns should not be simple carbon copies of the
corresponding events in goods. Within the promotion process, there must be a sensitivity
to business opportunities over and above the display of promotional materials. There is,
in other words, a bigger demand on the promoting agency for a business orientation to be
built into the task of promoting, than in the case of goods. A major consideration in
designing an external promotion strategy is therefore establishing the right institutional
network to ensure effective use of public sector resources with leadership from the
private sector.
- The HKCSI has argued that it would be more cost effective for Hong Kong to harness both
TDC and private sector resources. To paraphrase our proposal, the bulk of
the work of services promotion - trade fairs, roadshows, missions, business receptions,
trade enquiries, database services, trade publications, information and market
intelligence, advertising and media campaigns, representative offices, etc. - should be
executed jointly by the TDC and private sector practitioners in trade promotion, while the
CSI should take up the tasks of coordination and development through running the Services
Advisory Committee (or Services Promotion Board). We remain open minded about how the
final organisation should be structured, but as the consideration for promotion of
services has now moved beyond exports to also investment, productivity and others, our
position - that on the one hand TDC's infrastructure and promotional resources should be
utilised, and on the other TDC should not be the leading, not to speak of only,
organisation involved in services promotion - has been reinforced.
Recommendations
- The HKCSI's recommendations in respect of government's role promoting
services overseas have been detailed in its response to the consultancy report on
promotion of services exports. In summary, they include the following:
- The promotion of services exports should not be limited to the "tradeable
services" as defined by KPMG, but should also be related to those service
transactions delivered through "commercial presence" and "consumption
abroad".
- Export promotional policies should be led by the private sector. In designing these
programmes, the identifying of sectoral linkages and appropriate promotional themes is as
important as, if not more important than, identifying sectors for promotion.
Organisational option
- Because of the highly interrelated nature of service sectors, the increasing
overlap between trade and investment, and the interdependence between goods and services,
it is difficult to decide on the most appropriate organisational structure for promotion
of services without first evaluating carefully the present structure in promotion and the
interrelationship between external promotion and domestic promotion. For example, if the
TDC were to take up implementation of services export promotion, would that be an
additional task for the TDC or should there be a restructuring of TDC resources, bearing
in mind the changing nature of Hong Kong's economic structure? How should the TDC and CSI
relate to other organisations which may also have a role in promotion? How are various
government branches and departments to coordinate with each other and with the promotional
agencies? What would be the role of the Hong Kong government overseas offices?
- Assuming that there will be no major change to the present institutional structure in
industrial support, the actual work in promoting services will be split among a number of
existing organisations, including the TDC, the HKPC, Industry Department, government
overseas offices, and various private sector agencies. However, at the end of the day some
agency will have to assume the task of policy direction and overall coordination. It would
be inappropriate for this agency to be a government department as promotion should not be
government's primary role. There seems to us to be a number of possibilities which need to
be carefully considered:
- The TDC could be further expanded to assume this role. We have already indicated our
reservations about a similar role of the TDC in external promotion of services, and we
would have even stronger reservations if the TDC's role were to be further expanded to
include internal promotion as well.
- We have already made the suggestion that the CSI could be given the task of policy
making and coordination in relation to promotion of services exports. In view of the
expanded scope of services promotion, the case for a CSI role is even stronger. The
strength of the CSI lies not in an abundance of resources in promotion, but in the network
of private sector practitioners which the CSI is able to tap into without creating a great
demand on additional resources. To be successful, however, the relationship between the
CSI and existing promotional bodies need to be evaluated carefully.
- Another possibility is to establish an independent body, such as an "Economic
Development Commission", to undertake direction and coordination of promotion. This
looks an attractive option but there are also many potential problems, for example, should
this body be merely a policy body or should it assume some executive function? Would it
become a "super-agency" making it difficult for a cooperative relationship to be
formed with existing bodies? Would it become too detached, or would some of its work
overlap with other existing bodies? All these need to be carefully thought through.
- In view of the rapid change in Hong Kong's economic structure, perhaps some radical
thinking is justified, although this does not necessarily call for a radical change in
institutional structure. For example, should there be a re-think of the whole
institutional structure in industrial support? The present structure has evolved from an
industrial diversification strategy which has long become out of date. The distinction
between trade and industry or between goods and services is no longer as meaningful now as
they used to be. Should there be a restructuring of the current institutions in economic
support? For example, should there be a massive restructuring of the TDC (to become an
"Economic Development Council"), so that services promotion becomes an integral
part of a new mandate, rather than an additional task for the present TDC?
- Perhaps the question of organisation structure is not the most urgent issue at present.
We should be in a better position to answer the above questions after the more substantive
issues of the need and themes of promotion have been identified. In any case, however much
(or little) the organisational structure is to be changed, our position that promotion
should be private-sector led with the CSI playing a substantial role, and that current
resources (both public and private sector) should be deployed in the most efficient manner
in promotion of services, remains unchanged. To achieve this, some form of review or audit
of current resources through a combined private/public sector effort will be required. The
HKCSI would be happy to participate in this process of reviewing organisational resources
and we look forward to an early opportunity of making further recommendations on
organisational options in the course of the Task Force's deliberations.
Recommendation
- A restructuring of current organisational resources in promotion may be
required. Before the organisation structure is finalised, the relationship between
external promotion and other promotional activities should be thought through. Whatever
the form of the final structure, promotion should be private-sector led, with current
resources (both public and private sector) deployed in the most efficient manner. To
achieve this, some form of review or audit of current resources through a combined
private/public sector effort will be required. The HKCSI would be happy to participate in
this process of reviewing organisational resources and we look forward to an early
opportunity of making further recommendations on organisational options in the course of
the Task Force's deliberations.
Sectoral issues
(Recommendations highlighted)
Tourism
- As one of the most stable sectors of the economy, the travel/tourism
industries are a steady provider of employment for the economy and as such play a positive
role in helping the economy adjust to restructuring. But the potential of the
travel/tourism industries can only be fully realised if their development is supported
by full manpower planning and long-term education. The tourism sector has been highly
successful in promoting itself, with a first-rate promotion machinery already well
established. It is perhaps less accomplished in planning, development and coordination
with the other service industries where, as far as promotion of services is concerned, the
burden of the future work lies. In considering the further development of tourism
services, therefore, there should be a focus on the relationship between tourism services
and other infrastructure and support facilities.
Cruise liner industry
- The cruise liner industry is a specialised sector of the tourism industries.
The growth potential is strong, especially from Asian consumers who have benefitted from
economic development in recent decades. Also, crew members are typically high-spending
consumers.
- There is good potential for Hong Kong to develop as a regional centre for this
high-value industry. However, competition from rival centres such as Singapore is also
likely to be strong. Against this background, there is a curious lack of infrastructure
facilities for cruise liners, in spite of Hong Kong's reputation as one of the finest
ports of the world. The Ocean Terminal, which provides berthing for cruise liners, has a
limited capacity. It is also an unregulated monopoly. In the interest of this high-value
service sector, and of the tourism industry as a whole, we recommend that more
terminals be created for cruise liners within the harbour. Such terminals could have a
spinoff effect on other service industries such as retail and catering. In the longer
term, there may be merits for a separate port authority to be established to regulate
commercial port facilities such as those required for the cruise liner industry.
Financial services
The promotion of the financial services sector calls for a different approach from that
of manufactured goods. The overall performance of the financial services industry depends
not so much on assistance from non-financial promotional agencies such as business
matching or trade exhibitions, but on a range of related matters such as regulatory
environment, the development of other industries (financial services rarely existing on
its own), competition from other regional financial centres, access to support
technologies, consumer awareness, etc. An integral approach is required to develop a
strategy for promoting financial ervices. A good example is that of the Corporation of
London, which took three years to draw up a business promotional plan for the City of
London. The financial services industries of Hong Kong should, together with the
regulator, take a similarly long-term view. They should take advantage of the 1997
IMF/World Bank Convention in Hong Kong and take the opportunity not only to generate
international publicity about Hong Kong's financial services, but also formulate a
strategy to maintain and reinforce Hong Kong's lead in the region.
Computer services
- A viable partnership could be formed between firms in Hong Kong and China,
using the latter as a "back-office", except that unlike other typical
back-office operations which tend to be labour-intensive or low-skilled, the China
operation could be highly technical. Hong Kong computer services operators could provide
management and system design while taking advantage of China's expertise in software
development at much lower staff cost.
Information technology
- The most elaborate application of EDI will be represented by Tradelink when
it is finally up and running. However, the benefits of EDI extend much farther than trade,
thus other applications of EDI should also be promoted.
- There is as yet no formalised structure for information communication (such as Internet)
in Asia, consequently users have to communicate through hubs elsewhere. With an advanced
telecommunications and business infrastructure already in place, Hong Kong should
establish itself as the communications hub for the information industries. However,
competition from regional economies (e.g. Singapore) is keen. The development of an
information infrastructure strategy is thus an urgent need.
Transport
- The strength of Hong Kong's transport lies in its highly successful port
services. To maintain this strength, however, Hong Kong needs to move into a "total
transport service" of which maritime transport is but a part. The global market is
becoming more competitive and a transport company's edge will increasingly lie in the
ability to provide a package of related services, rather than just one mode of transport.
While Hong Kong's shipping and port services are highly sophisticated, there has not been
a similar technological upgrading of their land-based counterpart. Multimodal services
are becoming the leading edge and Hong Kong's land-based transport services should be
ready to catch up.
Culture
- One of the major marketing themes for Hong Kong is its East-meets-West
character, yet there is no comprehensive policy of integrating the development of the
arts, culture and entertainment together with tourism. Such a policy is needed to
provide direction to developing Hong Kong as a regional centre for arts, culture and
entertainment.
Professional services
- The continual economic development of China has created opportunities for the
professional services sectors. China should be encouraged to see the need for bringing in
experienced professionals from outside. To facilitate its development, China requires more
surveyors, town planners, architects, etc. An opportunity is created for Hong Kong
professionals to convince China of Hong Kong's ability to provide the professional
services that China needs. One of the means of tapping this China market is to champion
multi-disciplinary practices whereby various professions combine to offer their expertise
in areas demanded by China's developmental needs, e.g. construction, infrastructure,
environment.
- China also has an elaborate professional services sector in the scientific disciplines
such as engineering and medicine. These professionals are high-quality but they often lack
management and business support, and may sometimes lack quality control as well. A
partnership could be created between Hong Kong and Mainland professionals combining the
skills of Chinese professionals with the management and business orientation of their Hong
Kong counterparts.
Management consultancy
- There is a good case for promoting Hong Kong as a major centre of excellence
in management consultancy serving the China market, where Hong Kong's strength is
self-evident. However, consistent with Hong Kong's regional centre role and to ensure a
broader scope of competencies are developed and maintained, the management consultancy
sector of Hong Kong needs also to promote itself to the wider Asia-Pacific regional
market, where competition from neighbouring economies such as Singapore is much stronger.
- There is a good potential for growth for the local management consultancy sector,
provided that it can constantly upgrade itself in response to the opportunities created by
the expanding Asian market. The private and the public sectors both have an important role
in enabling the consultancy sector to take advantage of this potential.
- On the part of management consultants, there is a need for self-regulatory mechanisms to
be established which will ensure that high standards are maintained in the industry and
ongoing efforts are made to improve the quality of service provided. Another priority is
to improve general efficiency of the sector through better client education, such as by
developing guidelines for clients on the nature of consultancy services, fees, and how to
select a consultant. Eventually an industry association should be formed for that purpose,
but in the meantime a subcommittee has been established within the HKCSI to act as
spokesman for the consultancy sector. The HKCSI has also developed a voluntary code of
ethics to which management consultants are encouraged to subscribe.
- As a major user of management consultants, government should be encouraged to be more
discerning in the hiring of consultants. It can help build up a critical mass of
high-quality local management consultants by hiring more of them and publicising some of
their works. This would also benefit government through demonstrating how consultancy
money is being put to good use. As a general measure to improve efficiency of consultancy
efforts and ensure high industry standards, government should take the lead in
publishing a model set of transparent criteria for reference for selection of management
consultants. One of these criteria should be the consultant's subscribing to a code of
ethics such as that of the HKCSI.
- In external promotion, government should include this sector in the overall
promotional campaign for service industries, both on its own and in relation to other
sectors such as financial services and information technology. The management
consultancy sector has many strengths which can be highlighted in promotional programmes.
The HKCSI management consultants subgroup will be prepared to identify these strengths and
work together with government to formulate a promotional strategy as well as the
appropriate publicity literature.
¡@

